AI Writing Patterns: Research & Data
We analyzed 186,000+ articles to map AI text patterns across 5+ models. Detection tools now identify AI writing with 97% accuracy using word choice and sentence rhythm alone. The data below covers everything content teams and SEO agencies need to know.
Quick Detection Guide
Spot AI-generated text in seconds
Visual Scan
- ✗Excessive bullet points (groups of 3)
- ✗Perfect parallel structure
- ✗Em dashes everywhere (2+ per 200 words)
- ✗Uniform paragraph lengths
- ✗Bold headers + emojis
Phrase Check
Find 2+ of these = likely AI
- ✗ "delve into this topic"
- ✗ "tapestry of experiences"
- ✗ "navigate the landscape"
- ✗ "leverage synergies"
- ✗ "seamlessly integrate"
- ✗ "robust framework"
- ✗ "Here's why:" or "Here's what:"
- ✗ "It's not X. It's Y." (repeated)
Burstiness
1. Count words in 5 random sentences
2. Calculate: μ (average) and σ (std dev)
3. Formula: B = (σ / μ) × 100
B < 30 = Likely AI
Example: 24, 23, 26, 25, 24 → B = 4.7
B > 50 = Likely Human
Example: 8, 34, 12, 41, 15 → B = 66.6
20-Second Structure Test
Opening
"In today's rapidly evolving..." = AI
Body
Every paragraph same length? = AI
Lists
Groups of exactly 3 items? = AI
Closing
"What are your thoughts?" = AI
Rhythm
Metronome vs Jazz? Metronome = AI
Sentences
All 20-30 words? = AI
AI Detection Hierarchy
Confidence levels for identifying AI-generated text
Tier 1: Immediate Red Flags
90-99% AI probabilityLeft-in prompt artifacts
99%“Certainly, here is a possible introduction...”
Left-in refusal text
99%“I'm sorry, but I don't have access to real-time information”
Multiple signature words
95%“5+ words from signature list”
'delve' in academic context
95%“We delve into the implications...”
Perfect triadic repetition
90%“5+ instances of groups of 3”
Tier 2: Strong Indicators
70-90% AI probabilityLow burstiness (B < 20)
85%“All sentences 22-28 words”
Uniform paragraph length
75%“Every paragraph 4-5 sentences”
Em dash frequency
80%“5+ per 200 words”
Setup phrase density
70%“3+ 'Here's' or 'The truth is' per 300 words”
Formulaic structure repetition
85%“'It's not X, it's Y' used 3+ times”
Tier 3: Moderate Indicators
40-60% AI probabilityCorporate buzzword density
50%“3-5 words like 'leverage,' 'synergy'”
Consistent Oxford commas
40%“Never omitted”
Question-answer cadence
55%“2+ rhetorical Q&A pairs”
Parallel bullet perfection
60%“All bullets identical structure”
Generic enthusiasm
45%“'Great question!' 'Excellent point!'”
AI Detection Tools Comparison
Performance metrics for popular AI text detection tools
| Tool | Accuracy | False Positive | Speed | Cost | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Binoculars | 99% | 1% | Medium | Free | Best accuracy |
| Copyleaks | 94.9% | 5.52% | Fast | $$$ | High accuracy |
| Originality.ai | 92.5% | 4.79% | Fast | $$$ | Combines metrics |
| GPTZero | 89.8% | 5.12% | Fast | $$ | Threshold >85 for human |
| Turnitin | 79% | 2.5% | Slow | $$$$ | Educational standard |
| ZeroGPT | 68.5% | 21% | Fast | $ | High false positive |
How to Defeat Detection
✓ What Works
- • Paraphrasing (-20% detection)
- • Humanizer Tools (90% effective)
- • Prompt Engineering (87% effective)
- • QuillBot (50% effective)
✗ What Fails
- • Removing Buzzwords (5% effective)
- • Minor Edits (10% effective)
- • Patterns remain structural, not lexical
Technical Detection Metrics
Burstiness Formula
Measures sentence length variation, the most reliable structural tell
Formula
B = (σ / μ) × 100
σ = Standard deviation
μ = Mean sentence length
B = Burstiness score
AI Pattern
B = 4.7
Sentences: 24, 23, 26, 25, 24 words
Average: 24.4
Std Dev: 1.14
Low variation = metronome rhythm = AI
Human Pattern
B = 66.6
Sentences: 8, 34, 12, 41, 15 words
Average: 22
Std Dev: 14.66
High variation = jazz rhythm = Human
Threshold: B < 30
Uniform sentence lengths indicate AI generation. Low burstiness reveals algorithmic consistency.
Threshold: B > 50
Natural variation in sentence length indicates human authorship. High burstiness reflects cognitive rhythm.
Perplexity Score Analysis
How "surprised" a language model is by word choices
Score 5-10
Extremely Predictable
AI-generated (GPT-4, Claude, Gemini)
Score 10-20
Very Predictable
Heavily edited or templated writing
Score 20-50
Normal Variation
Human writing
Score 50+
Unexpected/Creative
Literary fiction, poetry, technical jargon
Why AI scores low: Large language models generate the most probable next token. Predictability is the core mechanism. Detection tools like GPTZero use threshold >85 for likely human authorship.
Want to get cited in AI search?
Geostar is a GEO and SEO agency. Our team handles content, technical implementation, and web development to get your brand cited in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews.
Brands that act now will own the next era of search.